The average classroom in the United States hosts a variety of cultures
as well as languages. We felt that we should address this fact with
a strong look at multi-cultural education, and its role in our website.
The simplest way to incorporate at least some level of multiculturalism
into a project is to make it accessable to as many cultures as possible
(Lesko & Bloom, 1998). In order to accomplish this idea in our website
we have provided a set of English and Spanish directions.
The
most important of our goals is to make our web site applicable to
the content of math and science curriculums. With such a wide range
of contents being taught in the science/math classroom of today
we felt that a hands on approach to the CBL technology would be
the most helpful. Laboratories are one of the general separating
factors between math/science classrooms and the other subjects (Ross
& Hogaboam-Gray, 1998), and easily some of the most effective and
widespread pieces of equipment available to the math/science classrooms
of today are the graphing calculator and the CBL system (Ravenscroft,
Tait & Hughes, 1998). In light of these ideas, we quickly decided
to center our website around learning to use and implement the graphing
calculator and the CBL system into the math/science classroom as
a useful and effective tool.
Although
we have attempted to make this site as thorough as possible, we
recognize that teachers may have needs or questions that we have
not anticipated. It is for this reason that we have included in
our site a long list of other accessory websites that may further
help our audience.
The audience of our site consists of math or science teachers who
wish to learn how to use a CBL. We maintain a basic assumption that
these teachers are novice users. For this reason we have chosen
experiments whose set up and operation are trivial so that focus
may be given to learning how to use the technology as well as applications
for the classroom. This rationale will help the teacher accept and
understand the use of the technology easier than if the website
was set up in a more technical fashion (Becker & Ravitz, 1999).
An effective curriculum must accomodate the changing needs of the
learner. To determine what these needs are, we have incorporated
an evaluation form that allows the user to evaluate the usefulness
and usability of our site as well as how much it has effected their
decision to incorporate technology into their classroom (Findley
& Findley, 1997). This mechanism will allow us to make changes to
the curriculum of our site to meet the changes in our participating
teachers.
We
hope that by following the goals of multiculturalism, applicability
of content, external resources, ease of understanding, and adaptability
that our web site will be a useful tool for all math and science
teachers. Especially for those teachers that are unable, for whatever
reason, to attend workshops and training on the technology of today.
Becker,
H. J. & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet
use on teacher's pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal
of Research on Computing in Education 31, 356-384.
Dexter,
S. & Anderson, R. E. (1999). Teacher's views of computers as catalysts
for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing
in Science Education 31, 221-239.
Findley,
B. & Findley, D. (1997). Strategies for effective distance education.
Contemporary Education 68, 118-120.
Lesko,
N. & Bloom, L. R. (1998). Close encounters: truth, experience, and
interpretation in multicultural teacher education. Journal of Curriculum
Studies 30, 375-395.
Powers,
S. (1997). Three little words: interactive, distance, and learning.
Contemporary Education 68, 92-94.
Pugalee,
D. K. & Robinson, R. (1998). A study of the impact of teacher training
in using Internet resources for mathematics and science instruction.
Journal of Research on Computing Education 31, 78-95.
Ravenscroft,
A., Tait, K. & Hughes, I. (1998). Beyond the media: knowledge level
interaction and guided integration for CBL systems. Computers and
Education 30, 49-56.
Ross,
J. & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998). Integrating mathematics, science,
and technology: effects on students. International Journal of Science
Education 20, 1119-1135.
Simonson,
M. (1997). Distance education: does anyone really want to learn
at a distance? Contemporary Education 68, 104-107.
All
graphics were created by Carlos Curto and Beth Snoke
All photographs were taken by Beth Snoke and Grant Holley
Spanish translation
by Carlos Curto
Beth Snoke is
Coordinator of Student Programs at The
Science House, an outreach project of North Carolina State University.
She is a graduate of UNC-Chapel Hill with a degree in physics and
has taught high school physics for several years. Beth enjoys gardening
and watching Carolina basketball.
Carlos Curto is
a doctoral student in the Science Education program at NC State.
He graduated from the University of New Hampshire with a M.S. in
physics. Carlos is from Spain and likes to play soccer.
Grant Holley
is a doctoral student in the Science Education program
at NC State and has a tiny little office where he does stuff with
Biology teachers. Grant is a graduate of Marshall Univeristy with
degrees in zoology and chemistry as well as an M.A. in education.
He has also taught many different levels of high school and middle
school science.
Other
Contributors
We would like to recognize the following people for
their contributions to inspiring and developing this web site.
Judy
Day - for contributing her Getting Started with TI-83 Plus/TI-83
to the Technical Support page.
April
Cleveland (and Lisa Grable) - for sharing the Water
What-ifs web site
Liz
Woolard - for letting us use her light intensity activity